Now listening in the gaming district

Hear your market before you launch

Synthetic personas, enriched with real human surveys, tell you what they’d choose and why, before you spend the budget.

5M+
personas
10
markets
30
languages

Enriched with real human survey responses

Real people in. Synthetic personas out.

Our personas are synthetic, but they are not made up. Each one is enriched with answers from real human surveys, so it reflects how people like them actually think, buy and decide.

  1. 1

    Real people answer surveys

    Respondents across 10 markets tell us what they buy, what they notice, what they believe and why.

  2. 2

    Their answers enrich each persona

    Responses are matched to personas with the same age, region, language and habits, layer by layer.

  3. 3

    They answer your questions

    Every answer can be traced back to the human survey evidence behind it, and says so when the evidence runs out.

One roster. Every kind of decision.

Put a headline, a price, a concept, a claim, a creative or a new market in front of a panel drawn from 5M+ survey-enriched personas. Scroll through six sample studies.

Too many decisions. Too little early evidence.

Teams choose concepts, claims, prices and campaigns before there is time or budget to test every option, and what they learn ends up scattered.

Same four decisions, two ways to make them
71%Cans
58%Concentrate
39%Sleep blend
32%Box
?Prototype this
Product and innovation

Which concept gets built?

Four ideas, one budget, settled by whoever argues best.Paired ratings rank all four before a prototype is funded.

AFly home in comfort63%
BNo annual fee37%
“I like A”“B feels bolder”
+20
Brand, growth and agencies

Which ad gets the media money?

Picked in a review meeting, then tested with live spend.63% of the panel choose A, and you can read why.

₹229Will they pay? “Four times the price of loose tea.”
₹149₹179₹199₹229₹259
Pricing and commercial

Where does interest fall off?

Objections show up after the price is live.Interest drops past ₹199, and value-first buyers say why.

Q2 deck.pptxBrief v3 (final).docRe: Re: findings
Study 12 · Festive launch✓ Brief✓ 24 personas✓ Every answer, with sources
Research and insights

Where did last quarter’s findings go?

Answers live in decks and inboxes, cut off from the brief.Every study is saved with its brief, roster and reasoning.

Sample studies, illustrative numbers.

From brief to next experiment, in one workflow.

Every finding stays tied to the brief and audience that produced it, so you can compare, revise and rerun without losing what came before.

Revise and rerun
Step 1 of 4Define the brief

The decision, the alternatives to compare and the markets that matter.

Study thread · Festive SUV launch
1Brief3 headlines · 4 markets 2Panel6 personas · 54 credits 3Run18 answers saved 4ResultA leads, 4.3 of 5

Six decision workspaces. One roster behind them all.

Keep the same audience across product, creative, pricing, segmentation and strategy questions, so answers can be compared, not argued about.

Attention estimates, grounded in real human surveys.

Every persona is enriched with answers from real people: what they notice first in an ad, what they skip, and what makes them act. So when a persona looks at your creative, it looks the way people like them actually do.

  1. Real people answer surveysAbout ads they saw: what caught their eye, what they missed, what they’d do next.
  2. Personas are enriched with those answersMatched to people with the same age, market and buying habits.
  3. They score your creativeEach region gets a 1 to 5 estimate, shown next to the human survey benchmark.

Survey-grounded estimates, not measured eye tracking. Use them to choose what to test with people.

See marketing and creative

Follow the simulation. Inspect every contribution.

Progress comes from saved checkpoints, not a timer. Every persona’s contribution appears as it is saved, with who it responds to and where they disagree.

Motion illustrates processing, not live speech. Sample study, illustrative data.

Hyperlocal, down to the dialect.

Country, state, then city. Personas who live there talk your creative through and rewrite it in their own dialect. Not a translation: how people there actually say it.

A persona here is not a prompt. It is backed by real answers.

Each persona is built in five layers and enriched with real human survey responses. Before it answers, it looks up that evidence. When the evidence runs out, it says so.

QWould you buy a compact SUV this Dhanteras?
A scripted personaA character sheet, improvising

“Absolutely. Dhanteras is the biggest car-buying day of the year, and a compact SUV is exactly what families in my bracket choose. I’d book on day one.”

No sourceNever declinesNothing to check
Rahul MeenaJunior engineer, Rajasthan PWD
Live run

“I’d anchor it to Dhanteras. In Rajasthan, the purchase should feel like family prosperity, not just a new SUV. Keep the price as an easy monthly EMI, because that is how families like mine judge whether it fits.”

Human evidence retrieved before answering
1
Survey response, Rajasthan, 2025“Dhanteras is when the family buys together. It is about prosperity.”
2
Survey response, Jaipur, 2025“We always count it in EMIs, not lakhs.”
3
Interview transcriptNot needed for this answer.
  1. Human surveysReal answers from real people
  2. IdentityAge, place, work, household
  3. CognitionHow they decide
  4. VoiceRegister, idiom, language
  5. GuardrailsNo invented facts

Keep the brief. Keep the reasoning.

Every run preserves its brief, roster and assets. Reopen old studies without overwriting them, read any answer in full with its sources, and rerun only after a fresh quote.

One research layer for every team.

Scroll through five teams: what changes, and the questions they start asking.

Today

  • Concepts are ranked by whoever argues loudest in the workshop.
  • Every idea gets a prototype, or none do.
  • Packaging claims meet shoppers for the first time on the shelf.

With Anthryn

  • Paired ratings rank concepts, with the reasons attached.
  • Only the shortlist goes to prototyping and human tests.
  • Misread claims surface before legal review, not after launch.

The questions product teams start asking

  1. Which of these four concepts deserves a prototype?
  2. Which features actually move interest?
  3. Does “naturally calming” sound like a promise we can’t keep?
  4. What frustration are we not solving yet?

Today

  • Creative is picked in a review meeting, then tested with real media money.
  • One national line is translated, not rebuilt, for each region.
  • Nobody can say why the winning ad won.

With Anthryn

  • An explainable shortlist goes into the campaign test.
  • Each market’s personas rebuild the line, with change notes.
  • Attention estimates point at the CTA fix before launch.

The questions brand teams start asking

  1. Which ad should get the media budget?
  2. Will this headline land in Tamil Nadu and Rajasthan?
  3. Is the call to action seen before people scroll on?
  4. Which message works for which audience?

Today

  • Price points come from competitor shelves and gut feel.
  • Objections show up after the price is live.
  • Bundles are judged on total price alone.

With Anthryn

  • Interest at each tested price, split by buyer context.
  • Objections in each group’s own words, before the test.
  • Total price, unit price and quantity compared side by side.

The questions pricing teams start asking

  1. Where does interest fall off for value-first buyers?
  2. Will a duo pack beat a 15% discount?
  3. Who objects at ₹229, and what would change their mind?
  4. What would make a loyal buyer switch?

Today

  • Fieldwork is booked around loose hypotheses.
  • Last quarter’s findings live in a deck nobody can find.
  • Generic chat tools give confident answers with no trail.

With Anthryn

  • A tighter brief before the human study is booked.
  • Every study, brief and roster saved and searchable.
  • Answers you can trace to the passages behind them.

The questions insights teams start asking

  1. What should the human study actually focus on?
  2. Where would shoppers stall on our checkout?
  3. What changed since the last wave, and why?
  4. Where do our audiences disagree with each other?

Today

  • A master line goes to translators and comes back literal.
  • Festival, idiom and price framing are guessed for each market.
  • Nobody can check the copy without knowing the language.

With Anthryn

  • Personas from each region rebuild the line, in sequence.
  • Every change is tagged: festival, idiom, honorific, price framing.
  • A literal back-translation you can check yourself.

The questions regional teams start asking

  1. Should we name Diwali, or keep the festival open?
  2. Is “EMI” or “price” the right frame in Kerala?
  3. Does this sound translated, or local?
  4. Which honorific fits a family audience?

Where Anthryn fits.

Alongside human research, not instead of it. Arrive at fieldwork with sharper hypotheses and fewer wasted sessions.

Generic chat tool

Fast, but forgets and invents.

1/6 strengths
  • Same brief and audienceStarts fresh each chat
  • Product to strategy in one placeUnstructured
  • Inspectable reasoningNo source trail
  • In-language, many marketsTranslated, not grounded
  • Time to a first readMinutes
  • Representative humansNo

Separate point tools

One job each, no shared audience.

0/6 strengths
  • Same brief and audiencePer tool
  • Product to strategy in one placeOne job each
  • Inspectable reasoningScores only
  • In-language, many marketsRarely
  • Time to a first readDays
  • Representative humansDepends

Human research

The gold standard, slow and costly.

3/6 strengths
  • Same brief and audiencePer study
  • Product to strategy in one placeSeparate projects
  • Inspectable reasoningTranscripts
  • In-language, many marketsOne agency per market
  • Time to a first read4 to 8 weeks
  • Representative humansThe gold standard
Recommended alongside fieldwork

Anthryn

Sharper hypotheses before fieldwork.

5/6 strengths
  • Same brief and audienceAcross every workspace
  • Product to strategy in one placeSix connected workspaces
  • Inspectable reasoningEvery answer, with sources
  • In-language, many markets10 markets, 30 languages
  • Time to a first readHours
  • Representative humansNo. It sharpens what you test
Does this wellPartlyNot really

Clear about what it shows, and what it doesn’t.

Synthetic research is useful when its limits are visible. Every screen in the product says what kind of evidence you are looking at.

What it gives you

Survey-grounded perspectives
From synthetic personas enriched with real human survey responses, in their own language.
Comparable alternatives
Paired ratings on the same brief and the same audience, with ties kept.
Reasoning you can inspect
Full answers, who replied to whom, and the passages behind each claim.
A study history
Briefs, rosters and assets kept per run and never overwritten.

What it does not establish

A replacement for your fieldwork
Personas are enriched with real survey data, but they are still synthetic. Validate the decisions that matter with your own customers.
Measured attention or outcomes
Heatmaps and rankings are 1 to 5 estimates and paired ratings, not gaze, recall, conversion or ROAS.
A live usability test
CX review reads public pages or screenshots only. No logins, clicks, forms or purchases.
Certifications we don’t hold
Records are scoped to your account. Ask us about anything else your security team needs; we answer with evidence.

Questions buyers ask.

Straight answers, including when to use real people instead.

Still have a question?

Ask us directly. We reply within one working day.

hello@Anthryn.ai
01Isn’t this just a chatbot with a persona prompt?

No. Each persona is enriched with real human survey responses and interviews, looks that evidence up before answering, and declines when it runs out. The workspace keeps the brief, audience, comparisons and run history.

02How do real surveys go into the personas?

Real people across 10 markets answer structured surveys about what they buy, notice and believe. Those responses enrich synthetic personas with the same age, region, language and habits. Today that is more than 5 million personas across 30 languages.

03When should we still talk to real people?

Whenever a finding has to stand on its own: claims, launch go or no-go, prices you commit to. Use Anthryn to decide what to test, then validate the shortlist with people.

04What does the attention heatmap measure?

Where personas say their attention goes, as 1 to 5 estimates with reasoning. It is not eye tracking. Use it to find hierarchy and CTA changes worth testing.

05Can we rerun a study without losing the old one?

Yes. Every run keeps its brief, roster and assets. A rerun creates a new run after a fresh cost quote.

06What happens to what we upload?

Projects and media are scoped to your account. Ask us what your security team needs and we’ll tell you exactly what is in place today.

07How does a pilot work?

Pick one decision you make every quarter. We set it up with you, run it on your markets, and compare it with what you later learn in market.

08Which markets and languages are covered?

India, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bangladesh, the UK and the US, across 34 regions.

Bring one decision you make every quarter.

Thirty minutes. Bring a brief and a market, and we run it live with you.

  1. 1
    Tell us the decisionAnd the markets it has to work in.
  2. 2
    We prepare your panelA draft audience before the call.
  3. 3
    We run it togetherThen plan a pilot, if it’s useful.
+5M
Your panel is drawn from 5M+ personas, enriched with real human surveys across 10 markets.
What are you deciding?

We use this only to prepare your demo.

Demo request received.

We’ll reply within one working day. In this design preview, nothing was sent.